<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What to invest in?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moneyanswertree.com/archives/35/what-to-invest-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moneyanswertree.com/archives/35/what-to-invest-in/</link>
	<description>investing, money, credit card debt, 401k, roth ira, credit cards, make money, personal finance, savings, retirement planning, free money, roth ira contribution, financial advice, free financial advice, online financial advice, savings account, money market, roth ira rules</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:24:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shanita Biron</title>
		<link>http://moneyanswertree.com/archives/35/what-to-invest-in/comment-page-1/#comment-1584</link>
		<dc:creator>Shanita Biron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 23:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyanswertree.com/archives/35/what-to-invest-in/#comment-1584</guid>
		<description>however I&#039;m searching about it very long time and I can not discover any data, and it is important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>however I&#8217;m searching about it very long time and I can not discover any data, and it is important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danae Dobbs</title>
		<link>http://moneyanswertree.com/archives/35/what-to-invest-in/comment-page-1/#comment-1559</link>
		<dc:creator>Danae Dobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyanswertree.com/archives/35/what-to-invest-in/#comment-1559</guid>
		<description>Is there any Muscle building supplement that you&#039;d recommend?  I wanna try one but I do not know which is best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any Muscle building supplement that you&#8217;d recommend?  I wanna try one but I do not know which is best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabadoo</title>
		<link>http://moneyanswertree.com/archives/35/what-to-invest-in/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabadoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyanswertree.com/archives/35/what-to-invest-in/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Sir, I believe you listed yourself earlier as a financial advisor. Well congratulations on passing the Series 7, quite an achievement. Unfortuantely for you, this only licesnses you to &#039;sell&#039; those stocks that your company is reccommeding and in the format they reccommend it in. It does not allow you to &#039;sell&#039; the same idea you have swallowed in your own portfolio (as I am 100% convinced you own CFC) in order to provide yourself with some reassurance. 

In fact, analysis IS all science, a wonderful science I have spent much of my life studying. You want top down approach, ok, we&#039;re heading into an election where the outcome appears to be a mega liberal president and a populist vice president. That is a recipe for financial market meltdown. We are currently in the first quarter of a protracted recession, and while a cut in interest rates might briefly stabilize mortgage rates, the current rampant level of inflation will surely tie the hands of the fed from any real rate cutting. This is definitely NOT the kind of market where one buys what everyone else is selling in hopes that the world soon comes rosy again.

You prefer bottom up? Millions upon millions of investors, traders, advisors and charlatans such as yourself have succumbed to the infamous &#039;bottom picking&#039; strategy. You feel a sense of wholeness and power in being able to &#039;call the bottom&#039; and be the first one in line to say it is all over. Unfortuately for you, 98% of the others lost all their money. This is why we say things like &#039;the trend is your friend&#039; and &#039;don&#039;t catch a falling knife&#039;. FACT: Price moves up when there is more buyers than sellers. FACT: the bulk of the market is comprised of institutional money spending millions of dollars on research and I am quite certain that this research has proved to be slightly more correct in NOT buying now than your armchair research with the faintest glimpse of a thought in one hand and a beer in the other. Here&#039;s another little tidbit for you, companies that have been wiped out like Citi and CFC, they rarely if ever have a &quot;V&quot; bottom. In fact, you can be assured that any sharp and quick rallies are just &#039;dead cat bounces&#039; designed to pay shorts and capture sucker bottom pickers. No this stock will flatline for awhile before ever truly rallying again.

Here&#039;s a piece of advice, if you want to risk your own funds and gamble in market, feel free. Don&#039;t delude yourself into thinking it isn&#039;t a science, or that you know more than the thousands of decorated analysts. But when it comes to a message board, and someone elses money, don&#039;t ever talk a person into stupid risk. It&#039;s completely unprofessional and looks amazingly poorly on you and your firm. I&#039;d hate to see what they would say to you if they knew you were on a message board touting for people to dump their house fund into CFC....especially after looking at YOUR portfolio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir, I believe you listed yourself earlier as a financial advisor. Well congratulations on passing the Series 7, quite an achievement. Unfortuantely for you, this only licesnses you to &#8217;sell&#8217; those stocks that your company is reccommeding and in the format they reccommend it in. It does not allow you to &#8217;sell&#8217; the same idea you have swallowed in your own portfolio (as I am 100% convinced you own CFC) in order to provide yourself with some reassurance. </p>
<p>In fact, analysis IS all science, a wonderful science I have spent much of my life studying. You want top down approach, ok, we&#8217;re heading into an election where the outcome appears to be a mega liberal president and a populist vice president. That is a recipe for financial market meltdown. We are currently in the first quarter of a protracted recession, and while a cut in interest rates might briefly stabilize mortgage rates, the current rampant level of inflation will surely tie the hands of the fed from any real rate cutting. This is definitely NOT the kind of market where one buys what everyone else is selling in hopes that the world soon comes rosy again.</p>
<p>You prefer bottom up? Millions upon millions of investors, traders, advisors and charlatans such as yourself have succumbed to the infamous &#8216;bottom picking&#8217; strategy. You feel a sense of wholeness and power in being able to &#8216;call the bottom&#8217; and be the first one in line to say it is all over. Unfortuately for you, 98% of the others lost all their money. This is why we say things like &#8216;the trend is your friend&#8217; and &#8216;don&#8217;t catch a falling knife&#8217;. FACT: Price moves up when there is more buyers than sellers. FACT: the bulk of the market is comprised of institutional money spending millions of dollars on research and I am quite certain that this research has proved to be slightly more correct in NOT buying now than your armchair research with the faintest glimpse of a thought in one hand and a beer in the other. Here&#8217;s another little tidbit for you, companies that have been wiped out like Citi and CFC, they rarely if ever have a &#8220;V&#8221; bottom. In fact, you can be assured that any sharp and quick rallies are just &#8216;dead cat bounces&#8217; designed to pay shorts and capture sucker bottom pickers. No this stock will flatline for awhile before ever truly rallying again.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a piece of advice, if you want to risk your own funds and gamble in market, feel free. Don&#8217;t delude yourself into thinking it isn&#8217;t a science, or that you know more than the thousands of decorated analysts. But when it comes to a message board, and someone elses money, don&#8217;t ever talk a person into stupid risk. It&#8217;s completely unprofessional and looks amazingly poorly on you and your firm. I&#8217;d hate to see what they would say to you if they knew you were on a message board touting for people to dump their house fund into CFC&#8230;.especially after looking at YOUR portfolio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jboynton</title>
		<link>http://moneyanswertree.com/archives/35/what-to-invest-in/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>jboynton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 04:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyanswertree.com/archives/35/what-to-invest-in/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Well, gentlemen, we will see where the mortgage investors go and in the mean time my advice stands... that those who want large rewards must take large risks. Those with a conservative tolerance should consider a portfolio, and those with a moderate tolerance should play the index game. My advice is based on the unsound anticipation that while everyone else is running for the high grounds of security, this industry may prove to do quite well and those who have a stake will be glad they stuck around.

Hot industries for 2008 appear to be Biotech and Telecom. I would advise that those who would like to see some growth this year find themselves some public ownership in either of these two very promising industries... as far as my company specific recommendations, I have learned not to tango with the &quot;over&quot; analysts that have membership on this site. It&#039;s not all science. In fact, the best investing is based on world economics and politics, and an understanding of where people are directing their free time and attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, gentlemen, we will see where the mortgage investors go and in the mean time my advice stands&#8230; that those who want large rewards must take large risks. Those with a conservative tolerance should consider a portfolio, and those with a moderate tolerance should play the index game. My advice is based on the unsound anticipation that while everyone else is running for the high grounds of security, this industry may prove to do quite well and those who have a stake will be glad they stuck around.</p>
<p>Hot industries for 2008 appear to be Biotech and Telecom. I would advise that those who would like to see some growth this year find themselves some public ownership in either of these two very promising industries&#8230; as far as my company specific recommendations, I have learned not to tango with the &#8220;over&#8221; analysts that have membership on this site. It&#8217;s not all science. In fact, the best investing is based on world economics and politics, and an understanding of where people are directing their free time and attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pbucelwicz</title>
		<link>http://moneyanswertree.com/archives/35/what-to-invest-in/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>pbucelwicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 19:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyanswertree.com/archives/35/what-to-invest-in/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Haha. Agreed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha. Agreed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sergik12</title>
		<link>http://moneyanswertree.com/archives/35/what-to-invest-in/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>sergik12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 19:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyanswertree.com/archives/35/what-to-invest-in/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Good point Gabadoo, a basket would definetly be better.

Also pbucelwicz if you lose 32% in 2 weeks you should be out of that stock. You can&#039;t justfy holding such a huge loser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Gabadoo, a basket would definetly be better.</p>
<p>Also pbucelwicz if you lose 32% in 2 weeks you should be out of that stock. You can&#8217;t justfy holding such a huge loser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabadoo</title>
		<link>http://moneyanswertree.com/archives/35/what-to-invest-in/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabadoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyanswertree.com/archives/35/what-to-invest-in/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Unless you are going to build a complete portfolio consisting of a minimum of 20 different stocks, I would not invest my &#039;house fund&#039; in individual stocks. While we can all &#039;speculate&#039; about the current subprime status, none of us can &#039;speculate&#039; the chance of a CFC getting whacked with some company specific event. Without diversification you are just gambling and taking unecessary risk, any run of the mill financial advisor can tell you this. If you want an avergae 10% annual growth rate, look for an index fund or enhanced index fund. If you want to find the asset that has dropped the most and attepmt to catch that falling knife hoping for a big rebound, look at the US Dollar or Japanese Yen. 

large systematic risk = large potential reward
large unsystematic risk = a bad idea</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless you are going to build a complete portfolio consisting of a minimum of 20 different stocks, I would not invest my &#8216;house fund&#8217; in individual stocks. While we can all &#8217;speculate&#8217; about the current subprime status, none of us can &#8217;speculate&#8217; the chance of a CFC getting whacked with some company specific event. Without diversification you are just gambling and taking unecessary risk, any run of the mill financial advisor can tell you this. If you want an avergae 10% annual growth rate, look for an index fund or enhanced index fund. If you want to find the asset that has dropped the most and attepmt to catch that falling knife hoping for a big rebound, look at the US Dollar or Japanese Yen. </p>
<p>large systematic risk = large potential reward<br />
large unsystematic risk = a bad idea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pbucelwicz</title>
		<link>http://moneyanswertree.com/archives/35/what-to-invest-in/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>pbucelwicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyanswertree.com/archives/35/what-to-invest-in/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Well, we will see what it&#039;s like in 2-3 years as that was the timeframe. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, we will see what it&#8217;s like in 2-3 years as that was the timeframe. <img src='http://moneyanswertree.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sergik12</title>
		<link>http://moneyanswertree.com/archives/35/what-to-invest-in/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>sergik12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyanswertree.com/archives/35/what-to-invest-in/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Good points but you just lost your investor 32% of their money since Dec 10th. :) go Countrywide Financial Group.

What do you think will happen when all the ARMs reset this year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points but you just lost your investor 32% of their money since Dec 10th. <img src='http://moneyanswertree.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  go Countrywide Financial Group.</p>
<p>What do you think will happen when all the ARMs reset this year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jboynton</title>
		<link>http://moneyanswertree.com/archives/35/what-to-invest-in/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>jboynton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyanswertree.com/archives/35/what-to-invest-in/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>If I were a day trader and wanted to see quick earnings, there were a few mortgage backed firms that could have done it last week. If I were advising someone to make a long term investment, I would recommend he stay away from individual stocks and look into Blackrock Funds. Then again, if a person wants to invest in stocks, their needs must be evaluated first. For instance, a person who wants to see growth should invest in Tech Stocks, a person interested in income should invest in Pharmaceuticals with dividend payouts, and a person interested in evading US market instability should invest in Internationals. In my opinion, internationals are a better investment than stocks that are based on indices. Sergik12, however, makes a good point in saying that Countrywide is a risk, but what every investor should recognize is that the greatest risk brings the greatest reward and the original question was to determine an agressive investment idea. 

A person interested in an agressive investment strategy will be interested in stocks with a high beta (a measure of investment risk). Evaluate Countrywide Financial Group and notice their volatility. In addition, while this company is likely to have difficulty with it&#039;s corporate restructuring, management could turn this company into a powerhouse, whereupon this stock could become very valuable. Indexing will not help an investor interested in an agressive strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I were a day trader and wanted to see quick earnings, there were a few mortgage backed firms that could have done it last week. If I were advising someone to make a long term investment, I would recommend he stay away from individual stocks and look into Blackrock Funds. Then again, if a person wants to invest in stocks, their needs must be evaluated first. For instance, a person who wants to see growth should invest in Tech Stocks, a person interested in income should invest in Pharmaceuticals with dividend payouts, and a person interested in evading US market instability should invest in Internationals. In my opinion, internationals are a better investment than stocks that are based on indices. Sergik12, however, makes a good point in saying that Countrywide is a risk, but what every investor should recognize is that the greatest risk brings the greatest reward and the original question was to determine an agressive investment idea. </p>
<p>A person interested in an agressive investment strategy will be interested in stocks with a high beta (a measure of investment risk). Evaluate Countrywide Financial Group and notice their volatility. In addition, while this company is likely to have difficulty with it&#8217;s corporate restructuring, management could turn this company into a powerhouse, whereupon this stock could become very valuable. Indexing will not help an investor interested in an agressive strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
